Error analysis of simple past tense in writing recount text produced by the eighth grade students of MTs Islamiyah Palangka Raya

Halisah, Nor (2015) Error analysis of simple past tense in writing recount text produced by the eighth grade students of MTs Islamiyah Palangka Raya. Undergraduate thesis, IAIN Palangka Raya.

Preview	Text abstract NH.pdf Download (572kB) | Preview
Preview	Text Cahapter I NH.pdf Download (170kB) | Preview
Preview	Text Chapter II NH.pdf Download (307kB) | Preview
Preview	Text Chapter III NH.pdf Download (249kB) | Preview
Preview	Text Chapter IV NH.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview
Preview	Text Chapter V NH.pdf Download (152kB) | Preview

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The principle purposes of the study as follows: a) To describe the types of errors; b) To describe the causes of errors of recount text. The research was conducted at the eighth grade students of MTs Islamiyah Palangka Raya. The population of this study was 61 students and sample of this study was all of the population or 61 students. The types of errors were analyzed based on the Dulay’s theory consists of four types of errors and cause of errors based on Richard’s theory consists of interlingual errors and intralingual errors are subdivided into overgeneralization, ignorance of rule restrictions, incomplete application of rules, and false concept hypothesized.

The quantitative approach was applied in this study. The research type of this study was descriptive research. In collecting the data, it was used test. Then for analyzing the data, it was used several techniques, namely: (1) identifying errors, (2) classifying errors, (3) explaining cause of errors.

The result of this study was as follows: (1) It has been found 765 the total errors made by the students in writing recount paragraph. Based on surface strategy taxonomy, the highest frequency errors made by the students was omission 461 errors or 60,26%. The second errors was addition 194 errors or 25,36%. The third errors was misformation 89 errors or 11,64%. The fourth errors was misordering 21 errors or 2,74%. (2) The common errors occurred by the students was omission. (3) Based on Richard’s theory which applied in explaining error phases, it was known that the students’ errors were the highest frequency errors’ cause of the students’ errors was incomplete application of rules 307 errors or 40,13%. The second cause of errors was over-generalization 164 errors or 21,44%. The third cause of errors was ignorance of rule restriction 124 errors or 16,21%. The fourth cause of errors was interlingual error 100 errors or 13,07%. The fifth cause of errors were false concept hypothesis 70 errors or 9,15%. The common cause of errors occurred by the students was incomplete application of rules.

ABSTRAK

Tujuan utama penelitian ini adalah sebagai berikut: a) Untuk mendeskripsikan tipe kesalahan; b) Mendeskripsikan penyebab dari kesalahan- kesalahan para siswa dalam teks recount. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan pada siswa-siswi di MTs Islamiyah Palangka Raya. Populasi penelitian ini terdiri dari 61 siswa dan sampel dari penelitian ini terdiri dari seluruh populasi atau 61 siswa. Tipe-tipe kesalahan yang dianalisis berdasarkan pada teori Dulai yaitu sebanyak empat tipe kesalahan dan penyebab kesalahan terdiri atas interlingual errors dan intralingual errors yang terbagi menjadi overgeneralization, ignorance of rule restrictions, incomplete application of rules, dan false concept hypothesized.

Pendekan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian Kuantitatif. Jenis penelitian dari penelitian ini adalah penelitian deskriptif. Dalam pengumpulan data digunakan tes. Sedangkan untuk menganalisis data digunakan beberapa teknik, yaitu (1) mengidentifikasi kesalahan, (2) menggambarkan kesalahan dan (3) menjabarkan penyebab kesalahan.

Adapun hasil temuan dari penelitian ini yaitu (1) dari 25 siswa yang menjadi sampel penelitian, terdapat 765 kesalahan dalam penulisan paragrap recount. Berdasarkan surface strategy taxonomy, frekuensi tertinggi kesalahan yang dibuat siswa adalah omission yaitu terdapat 461 kesalahan atau 60,26%. kesalahan kedua adalah addition terdapat 194 kesalahan atau 25,36%. Kesalahan yang ketiga adalah misformation yaitu 89 kesalahan atau 11,64%.
Kesalahan yang keempat adalah misordering yaitu 21 kesalahan atau 2,74%. (2) Tipe kesalahan yang umum dilakukan oleh para siswa adalah omission (3) Berdasarkan teori Richard, frekuensi penyebab kesalahan tertinggi adalah incomplete application of rules yaitu 307 kesalahan atau 40,13%. Penyebab yang kedua adalah over-generalization yaitu 164 kesalahan atau 21,44%. Penyebab yang ketiga adalah ignorance of rule restriction yaitu 124 kesalahan atau 16,21%. Penyebab yang keempat adalah interlingual error yaitu 100 kesalahan 13,07%. Penyebab yang kelima adalah false concept hypothesis yaitu 70 kesalahan atau 9,15%. Penyebab umum dari kesalahan tersebut adalah incomplete application of rules.

Actions (login required)

View Item