The Effect of Teacher’s Corrective Feedback Using Self-Repair and Self-Correct during Oral Interaction on Speaking Score of the Eleventh Grade Students at SMA Negeri 1 Katingan Tengah

Predi, Gantara (2014) The Effect of Teacher’s Corrective Feedback Using Self-Repair and Self-Correct during Oral Interaction on Speaking Score of the Eleventh Grade Students at SMA Negeri 1 Katingan Tengah. Undergraduate thesis, IAIN Palangka Raya.

[img]
Preview
Text
Abstract (PG).pdf

Download (398kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
Chapter I (PG).pdf

Download (391kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
Chapter II (PG).pdf

Download (472kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
Chapter III (PG).pdf

Download (418kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
Chapter IV (PG).pdf

Download (534kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
Chapter V (PG).pdf

Download (157kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
Chapter VI (PG).pdf

Download (161kB) | Preview

Abstract

The purposes of this research were (a) to measure the effect of teacher’s corrective feedback using self-correct; (b) to measure the effect of teacher’s corrective feedback using self-repair; (c) to measure which types of corrective feedback was more effective on students’ speaking score.
The writer used quantitative approach with quasi-experimental design. The writer designed the lesson plan, conducted the treatment, observed the students’ scores by pre-test and post-test. The population of the research was 199 students. They were all of the eleventh grade students at SMA Negeri 1 Katingan Tengah, which class XI IPS1 was 29 students, class XI IPS2 was 30 students, class IPS3 was 30 students, and class IPA was 30 students. The writer took three classes as the samples of this research. They were XI IPS1 as Control Group, class XI IPS2 as Experiment Group using self-repair, class IPS3 as Experiment Group using self-correct.
Writer used One-Way ANOVA to analyse the data, and the result showed that there was signifcant differences among groups after doing the treatment with Fvalue was higher than Ftable (11.32 ≥ 3.11). Then the writer applied Post Hoc Test to answer the research problems, and the result showed that (a) corrective feedback using self-correct was more effective on students’ speaking score than teaching English without giving corrective feedback with the significant value was lower than alpha (0.00 lower ≤ 0.05); (b) corrective feedback using self-repair was more effective on students’ speaking score than teaching English without giving corrective feedback, with the significant value was lower than alpha (0.01 lower ≤ 0.05); (c) there was no significant different effect between teacher’s corrective feedback using self-repair and self-correct on students’ speaking score, both methods were effective in improving students’ speaking score. It was based on the calculation showed that the significant value was higher than alpha (0.20 ≥ 0.05). Based on the output of the Mean, it can be concluded that Self-Correct (Mean: 74.63) is more effective than Self-Repair (Mean: 71.48).

Indonesia
Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah (a) untuk mengukur pengaruh umpan balik korektif guru menggunakan metode Self-Correct; (b) untuk mengukur pengaruh umpan balik korektif guru menggunakan metode self-repair; (c) untuk mengukur metode jenis korektif yang mana yang lebih efektif untuk meningkatkan skor berbicara siswa.
Penulis menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan desain quasi-eksperimen di dalam penelitian ini. Penulis merancang RPP, memberikan perlakuan, mengamati nilai siswa dengan pre-test dan post-test. Populasi penelitian berjumlah 199 siswa. Mereka adalah siswa kelas XI di SMA Negeri 1 Katingan Tengah, yang mana kelas XI IPS1 berjumlah 29 siswa, kelas XI IPS2 berjumlah 30 siswa, kelas IPS3 berjumlah 30 siswa, dan kelas IPA berjumlah 30 siswa. Penulis mengambil tiga kelas sebagai sampel penelitian ini. Mereka adalah XI IPS1 sebagai kelompok kontrol, kelas XI IPS2 sebagai kelompok ekperimen menggunakan metode self-repair, kelas IPS3 sebagai kelompok eksperimen menggunakan metode self-corret.
Penulis menggunakan ANOVA satu arah dalam menganalisis data, dan hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa ada perbedaan yang sangat signifikan antar kelompok setelah dilakukannya perlakuan dengan Fhitung lebih tinggi dari Ftabel (11.32 ≥ 3.11). Kemudian peneliti menerapkan Post Hoc Test untuk menjawab permasalahan penelitian, dan hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa (a) umpan balik korektif menggunakan self-correct lebih efektif dalam meningkatkan skor berbicara siswa daripada mengajar bahasa Inggris tanpa memberikan umpan balik korektif, dengan nilai signifikan lebih rendah dari alpha (0.00 rendah ≤ 0,05); (b) umpan balik korektif menggunakan self-repair lebih efektif dalam meningkatkan skor berbicara siswa daripada mengajar bahasa Inggris tanpa memberikan umpan balik korektif, dengan nilai signifikan lebih rendah dari alpha (0.01 rendah ≤ 0,05); (c) tidak ada pengaruh yang berbeda secara signifikan antara umpan balik korektif guru menggunakan metode self-correct dan self-repair pada skor berbicara siswa, kedua metode sama-sama baik dalam meningkatkan skor berbicara siswa. Hal ini didasarkan pada perhitungan menunjukkan bahwa nilai signifikan lebih tinggi dari alpha (0,20 ≥ 0,05). Tetapi berdasarkan hasil nilai rata-rata, dapat disimpulkan bahwa nilai rata-rata kelompok yang menggunakan Self-Correct adalah 74.63, dan lebeih efektif dari kelompok yang menggunakan Self-Repair dengan nilai rata-rata adalah 71.48

Item Type: Thesis (Undergraduate)
Subjects: 13 EDUCATION > 1302 Curriculum and Pedagogy > 130204 English and Literacy Curriculum and Pedagogy (excl. LOTE, ESL and TESOL)
20 LANGUAGE, COMMUNICATION AND CULTURE > 2003 Language Studies > 200302 English Language
Divisions: Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Ilmu Keguruan > Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa > Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris
Depositing User: usman usman usman
Date Deposited: 22 Dec 2016 09:38
Last Modified: 22 Dec 2016 09:38
URI: http://digilib.iain-palangkaraya.ac.id/id/eprint/321

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item