Studi komparatif putusan Pengadilan Agama Palangka Raya dan Putusan Pengadilan Agama Pasuruan tentang penentuan nafkah anak pasca perceraian ”

Hadi A., Muhammad Majidi (2018) Studi komparatif putusan Pengadilan Agama Palangka Raya dan Putusan Pengadilan Agama Pasuruan tentang penentuan nafkah anak pasca perceraian ”. Undergraduate thesis, IAIN Palangka Raya.

Text SKRIPSI MUHAMMAD MAJIDI HADI - 1402110439.pdf Download (1MB)

Abstract

Latar belakang penelitian ini ialah Putusan Pengadilan Agama Palangka Raya dan Putusan Pengadilan Agama Pasuruan tentang penentuan nafkah anak pasca percerian. Fokus penelitian ini tentang Kronologis pengajuan kasus Penentuan Nafkah Anak Pasca Perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Palangka raya dan Pengadilan Agama Pasuruan, Pertimbangan hakim dalam memutuskan perkara penentuan nafkah anak di Pengadilan Agama palangka Raya dan Pengadilan Agama Pasuruan dan hasil putusan Pengadilan Agama Palangka Raya dengan Pengadilan Agama Pasuruan.
Metodologi penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan penelitian normatif, melalui studi kasus putusan Pengadilan Agama Palangka Raya dan Pengadilan Agama Pasuruan, teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan metode dokumentasi kemudian diolah dan dianalisis menggunakan metode deskriptif komparatif.
Hasil Penelitian ini adalah Kronologis Perkara yang terdapat dalam Putusan Pengadilan Agama Palangka Raya adalah para pihak penggugat Ita Puspita sari (Penggugat) dengan Arif Budiman (Tergugat), Penggugat meminta penentuan nafkah anak pasca perceraian sebesar Rp. 25.000.000 perbulan. Sedangkan Kronologis yang terdapat dalam putusan Pengadilan Agama Pasuruan terkait permohonan Nafkah anak adalah Rp. 1.000.000 perbulan. Pertimbangan Hakim Pengadilan Agama Palangka Raya dalam menentukan Nafkah Anak Pasca Perceraian bahwa putusan Pengadilan Agama Palangka Raya menolak permintaan Penggugat terhadap nafkah anak sebesar Rp. 25.000.000 perbulan dengan alasan tidak ada bukti yang konkrit menunjukkan bahwa penghasilan suami diatas Rp. 75.000.000 perbulan, dan menetapkan bahwa nafkah anak sebesar Rp. 4.000.000 Perbulan. Sedangkan Pengadilan Agama Pasuruan dalam menentukan Nafkah Anak Pasca Perceraian sesuai dengan permohonan Penggugat sebesar Rp. 1.000.000 perbulan dengan alasan bahwa rincian penghasilan gajih sesuai dengan apa yang di tuturkan oleh Penggugat. Hasil Putusan Pengadilan Agama Palangka Raya dan Putusan Pengadilan Agama Pasuruan dalam Menentukan Nafkah Anak Pasca Perceraian bahwa kedua Pengadila Agama tersebut, sama-sama menerima Penentuan Nafkah Anak Pasca Perceraian, hanya saja besaran jumlah nominal dari uang yang di berikan perbulannya tidak sama karena penghasilan masing-masing pihak tergugat berbeda.

ABSTRACT

The background of this research is the Decision of the Palangka Raya Religion Court and the Decision of the Pasuruan Religion Court concerning the determination of the livelihood of post-divorce children. The focus of this research is on the Chronology of the submission of cases of Determination of Children 's Welfare in Post-Divorce at the Palangka Raya Religious Court and the Pasuruan Religious Court, Judges' consideration in deciding the case for determining the child's livelihood in the Palangka Raya Religious Court and the Pasuruan Religious Court and the Palangka Raya Religious Court decision with the Pasuruan Religious Court .
This research methodology uses a normative research approach, through case studies of the decisions of the Palangka Raya Religious Court and the Pauruan Religious Court, data collection techniques using documentation methods are then processed and analyzed by using comparative descriptive methods.
The results of this study are the Chronology of Cases contained in the Decision of the Palangka Raya Religion Court are the plaintiffs Ita Puspita sari (Plaintiff) with Arif Budiman (Defendant), the Plaintiff requested the determination of the livelihood of children after divorce amounting to Rp. 25,000,000 permonth. Whereas the Chronology contained in the decision of the Pasuruan Religion Court regarding the application for the living children of children is Rp. 1,000,000 per month. Consideration of Palangka Raya Religious Court Judges in determining the livelihood of post-divorce children that the decision of the Palangka Raya Religion Court rejected the Plaintiff's request for the child's livelihood of Rp. 25,000,000 permonth on the grounds that there is no concrete evidence to show that the husband's occupation is above Rp. 75,000,000 permonth, and stipulates that the child's livelihood is Rp. 4,000,000 Permonth. Whereas the Pasuruan Religious Court in determining the Income of Post-Divorced Children in accordance with the Plaintiff's request amounting to Rp. 1,000,000 permonth on the grounds that the details of income are in accordance with what was said by the Plaintiff. Results of the Palangka Raya Religious Court Decision and the Decision of the Pasuruan Religious Court in Determining the Post-Divorce Children 's Lives that the two Religious Courts, both received the Determination of the Post-Divorced Children' s Welfare, only that the nominal amount of money given permonth is not the same because of income each defendant is different.

Actions (login required)

View Item